Relationship between Mental Disorders, Smoking or Alcoholism and Benign Prostate Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Mental disorders, smoking, or alcoholism and benign prostate disease are highly prevalent in men. AIMS: To identify the relationship between mental disorders, smoking, or alcoholism and benign prostate disease. METHODOLOGY: A prospective multicenter study that evaluated prostate health status in 558 men from the community. Groups: GP-men who request a prostate health examination and whose medical history includes a mental disorder, smoking, or alcoholism prior to a diagnosis of benign prostate disease; GU-men who request a prostate health examination and whose medical history includes a benign prostate disease prior to a diagnosis of mental disorder, smoking, or alcoholism. VARIABLES: age, body mass index (BMI), prostate specific antigen (PSA), follow-up of the mental disorder, smoking or alcoholism, time elapsed between urological diagnosis and the mental disorder, smoking or alcoholism diagnosis, status of the urological disease (cured or not cured), concomitant diseases, surgical history, and concomitant treatments. Descriptive statistics, Student's t-test, Chi2, multivariate analysis. RESULTS: There were no mental disorders, smoking, or alcoholism in 51.97% of men. Anxiety, smoking, major depressive disorder, pathological insomnia, psychosis, and alcoholism were identified in 19.71%, 13.26%, 5.73%, 4.30%, 2.87%, and 2.15% of individuals, respectively. Nonbacterial prostatitis (31.54%), urinary tract infection (other than prostatitis, 24.37%), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (13.98%), and prostatodynia (1.43%) were prostate diseases. Unresolved symptomatic benign prostate disease was associated with anxiety, depression, and psychosis (p = 0.002). Smoking was the disorder that men managed to eliminate most frequently. The dominant disorder in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic disease was alcoholism (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Unresolved symptomatic benign prostatic disease is associated with anxiety, depression, and psychosis. Alcoholism is associated with a worse prognosis in the follow-up of symptomatic benign prostatic disease.

Bladder Capacity in Women With Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Cross-sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bladder capacity in women with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) through bladder diary, cystomanometry, and uroflowmetry and assess the concordance of the different measures of bladder capacity. A secondary objective is to describe the relationship between bladder capacity and urinary frequency in OAB patients. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional multicentric study was conducted, including female patients diagnosed with idiopathic OAB. All participants underwent a urodynamic study and completed a 3-day bladder diary (3dBD). Different parameters were used to calculate bladder capacity: maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) assessed at the end of filling cystometry, voided volume (VV) during the uroflowmetry, maximum voided volume (VVmax), and average voided volume (VVmed), both assessed through the 3dBD. Reproducibility analysis was performed to assess the agreement among the different bladder capacity measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted Kappa index were used. Bladder capacity parameters were also assessed in relation to urinary frequency. RESULTS: Bladder capacity measures were diminished in this population, except for VVmax. Poor correlation was found between the different bladder capacity variables (ICC and weighted Kappa index <0.4). Twenty-four-hour frequency and average VV present a weak negative linear relationship (Pearson coefficient -0.344). CONCLUSION: MCC and average VV are reduced in OAB patients. MCC does not correlate well with functional bladder volumes determined by voiding diary in the OAB population.

Efficacy and tolerability of the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens compared to tamsulosin in moderate-severe LUTS-BPH patients.

In a subset analysis of data from a 6-month, multicenter, non-interventional study, we compared change in symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and treatment tolerability, in men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) receiving tamsulosin (TAM, 0.4 mg/day) or the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens (HESr, 320 mg/day) as monotherapy. Symptoms and QoL were assessed using the IPSS and BII questionnaires, respectively. Patients in the treatment groups were matched using two statistical approaches (iterative and propensity score matching). Within the iterative matching approach, data was available from a total of 737 patients (353 TAM, 384 HESr). After 6 months, IPSS scores improved by a mean (SD) of 5.0 (4.3) points in the TAM group and 4.5 (4.7) points in the HESr group (p = 0.117, not significant). Improvements in QoL were equivalent in the two groups. TAM patients reported significantly more adverse effects than HESr patients (14.7% vs 2.1%; p < 0.001), particularly ejaculation dysfunction and orthostatic hypotension. These results show that HESr is a valid treatment option for men with moderate/severe LUTS/BPH; improvements in urinary symptoms and QoL were similar to those observed for tamsulosin, but with considerably fewer adverse effects.

Clinical Benefit of Tamsulosin and the Hexanic Extract of Serenoa Repens, in Combination or as Monotherapy, in Patients with Moderate/Severe LUTS-BPH: A Subset Analysis of the QUALIPROST Study.

To investigate whether tamsulosin (TAM) and the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens (HESr) are more effective in combination than as monotherapy in men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). Subset analysis of data from a 6-month, multicenter observational study. Patients received either tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day) or HESr (320 mg/day) alone or in combination. Primary endpoints were change in symptoms and quality of life. Tolerability was also assessed. Seven hundred and nine patients were available for intention to treat (ITT) analysis, 263 treated with tamsulosin, 262 with HESr, and 184 with TAM + HESr. After 6 months, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scores improved by a mean (standard deviation) of 7.2 (5.0) points in the TAM + HESr group compared to 5.7 (4.3) points with TAM alone and 5.4 (4.6) points with HESr (p < 0.001). Quality of life showed greatest improvement with combination therapy (p < 0.02). Adverse effects were reported by 1.9% of patients receiving HESr, 13.3% receiving TAM, and 12.0% receiving TAM + HESr (p < 0.001). In men with moderate/severe LUTS/BPH, combination treatment with TAM + HESr produced more effective symptom relief and greater improvement in quality of life than with either treatment alone, with acceptable tolerability.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Risk Group Classification Can Be Used to Anticipate Functional Recovery Outcomes after the Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence with Transobturator Suburethral Tape.

INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has an incidence of 15-80% in women. One of the most widely used surgical techniques for treatment is the placement of a suburethral transobturator tape (TOT). Although this technique has a relatively low morbidity rate, it is not exempt from intraoperative or postoperative complications, which can have an impact on functional recovery, understood as the return to routine life prior to the intervention. AIMS: To assess the time for functional recovery in women operated on for SUI by TOT; to identify complications and related factors, according to anaesthetic risk, which condition the time to functional recovery; and proposals for improvements in the prevention of possible complications and in reducing functional recovery time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-concurrent prospective observational multicenter study of 891 women undergoing TOT for stress urinary incontinence since 1 April 2003, who were successful in achieving urinary continence (completely dry). Study groups: GA (n = 443): patients with ASA I risk. GB (n = 306): patients with ASA II risk. GC (n = 142): patients with anaesthetic risk ASA III. Investigated variables: age, body mass index, follow-up time, secondary diagnoses, surgical history, obstetric-gynecological history, toxic habits, and complications derived from surgery: bleeding, pain, infection. Descriptive statistics, Student's t test, Chi2, Fisher, ANOVA, multivariate analysis, significance for p < 0.05. RESULTS: Mean age was 60.10 years (SD13.38), with no difference between groups. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.55 kg/m2 (SD 4.51), lowest in GA. GB had more HT (38.6%) than GC (23.23%), more type 2 diabetes (19.83% versus 10.56%), and more respiratory disorders (6.97% versus 2.11%). There were more women with anxiety in GB (19.3%) than in GC (6.33%) (p = 0.0221) and GA (10.51%) (p = 0.0004). There was more hypothyroidism in GB (16.08%) compared to GC (2.11%) and GA (9.07%). There was more history of curettage in GC (11.97%) versus GB (5.63%); and more pelvic surgery in GB (71.31%) and GC (66.9%) compared to GA (32.57%). There were more concomitant treatments with benzodiazepines in GC (27.46%) and GB (28.41%) than in GA (8.86%), and more parapharmacy treatments in GB (17.96%) than in GC (6.33%). Following the operation, 113 patients had some sign or symptom that required medical attention: in GA 48 (10.83%), in GB 49 (16.06%), in GC 16 (13.22%). Mean days until functional recovery in patients with complications: in GA 5.72 (SD2.05); bleeding 3 (SD1), pain 6.40 (SD1.34), and infection 7.33 (SD0.57), with fewer days for bleeding than for pain or infection. GB: 27.96 (SD 28.42), bleeding 3 (SD0), pain 46.69 (SD31.36), infection 10.83 (SD3.90); lowest for patients with bleeding. GC: 9.44 (SD 2.50); for bleeding 7.66 (SD2. 08), pain 10.66 (SD1.15), infection 10 (SD3.46); no differences. Overall, for women with bleeding, the time was 4.16 days (SD1.94); less in GA and GB than in GC. Pain, at 31.33 days (SD 30.70), was the factor that most delayed functional recovery; in GB women, it took longer to return to work due to pain (45.96, SD31.36) compared to GA (6.4, SD 1.34) and GC (10.66, SD1.15). In women with infection, overall mean time was 10.11 days (SD 3.61) with no difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mean time for the return to normal activity in patients who underwent TOT for SUI is 5 days if there are no complications, and 16.91 days if there are any. The ASA-SP risk group classification can be used to anticipate functional outcomes. An ASA-PS risk-based functional recovery forecasting protocol should be adapted, especially ASA II patients who may present with long-term disabling postoperative pain. Preventive management measures are proposed that favour functional recovery.

Amplio estudio (283 mujeres) sobre la eficacia de Manosar(R): 2 g de d-manosa + 140 mg de proantocianidinas (PAC), de liberación prolongada frente a 240 mg de PAC de liberación prolongada en la prevención a 6 meses por vía oral de las infecciones urinarias recurrentes / Large study (283 women) on the effectiveness of Manosar(R): 2 g of d-mannose + 140 mg of proanthocyanidins (PAC), of prolonged release

OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de la profilaxis de las infecciones del tracto urinario (ITUs) con un complemento alimenticio que contiene D-manosa como principio activo principal (Manosar(R)), en comparación con otro preparado cuyo principio activo único son las proantocianidinas (PAC), ambos de liberación continuada, tras su administración durante24 semanas. MÉTODOS: Estudio experimental multicéntrico, aleatorizado y doble ciego. Se incluyeron 283 mujeres con historia de ITUs recurrentes sin evidencias de complicación. Se randomizaron 1:1 en dos grupos. En un grupo se administró 1 sobre diario oral de Manosar®, y en el otro 1 sobre diario oral de un compuesto de 240 mg de PAC de liberación continuada. Previo a la inclusión en el estudio se confirmó el episodio de ITU al menos por la sintomatología clínica y positividad del test de Combur. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron datos válidos de 184 pacientes con edad media de 49,5 años: 90 recibieron Manosar(R) y 94 PAC aislado. Un total de 72 pacientes padecieron una ITU por E.coli: 25 pacientes en el brazo con Manosar(R) frente a 47 pacientes en el grupo de PAC aislado, siendo esta diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p = 0,002). El tiempo libre de nuevas recurrencias de ITU fue de 98,6 días en el grupo tratado con Manosar(R) y de 84,6 días en el grupo con PAC aislado. CONCLUSIÓN: La toma oral de un sobre al día de Manosar(R) es eficaz y segura en la prevención de las ITUs recurrentes en la mujer, siendo superior a la toma oral de PAC aislado

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety in the prophylasis of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with a food supplement that contains D-mannose like active ingredient (Manosar(R)), in comparison to another preparation in which the active ingredient are the proanthocyanidins (PAC), both of them, in prolonged released, after, they was administered for 24 weeks. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized and double blind experimental study was carried out. 283 women with a history of recurrent UTIs without evidence of complication were included. They were randomized 1: 1 in two groups. In one group, 1 oral sachet of Manosar(R) a day was administered, and in the other group 1 oral sachet of a compound of 240 mg of continuous-release PAC. Prior to inclusion in the study, the episode of UTI was confirmed at least by the clinical symptoms and positivity of the Combur test. RESULTS: Valid data were obtained from 184 patients with an average age of 49.5 years: 90 received Manosar(R) and 94 isolated PAC. A total of 72 patients suffered an UTI due to E.coli: 25 patients in the arm with Manosar(R) versus 47 patients in the isolated PAC group, this difference being statistically significant (p = 0.002). The free time of new UTI recurrences was 98.6 days in the group treated with Manosar(R) and 84.6 days in the group with isolated PAC. CONCLUSION: The oral taking of a daily sachet of Manosar(R) is effective and safe in preventing recurrent UTIs in women, being superior to the oral taking of isolated PAC

Large study (283 women) on the effectiveness of Manosar®: 2 g of d-mannose + 140 mg of proanthocyanidins (PAC), of prolonged release. / Amplio estudio (283 mujeres) sobre la eficacia de Manosar®: 2 g de d-manosa + 140 mg de proantocianidinas (PAC), de liberación prolongada frente a 240 mg de PAC de liberación prolongada en la prevención a 6 meses por vía oral de las infecciones urinarias recurrentes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety in the prophylasis of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with a food supplement that contains D-mannose like active ingredient (Manosar®), in comparison to another preparation in which the active ingredient are the proanthocyanidins (PAC), both of them, in prolonged released, after, they was administered for 24 weeks. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized and double blind experimental study was carried out. 283 women with a history of recurrent UTIs without evidence of complication were included. They were randomized 1: 1 in two groups. In one group, 1 oral sachet of Manosar® a day was administered, and in the other group 1 oral sachet of a compound of 240 mg of continuous-release PAC. Prior to inclusion in the study, the episode of UTI was confirmed at least by the clinical symptoms and positivity of the Combur test. RESULTS: Valid data were obtained from 184 patients with an average age of 49.5 years: 90 received Manosar® and 94 isolated PAC. A total of 72 patients suffered an UTI due to E.coli: 25 patients in the arm with Manosar® versus 47 patients in the isolated PAC group, this difference being statistically significant (p=0.002). The free time of new UTI recurrences was 98.6 days in the group treated with Manosar® and 84.6 days in the group with isolated PAC. CONCLUSION: The oral taking of a daily sachet of Manosar® is effective and safe in preventing recurrent UTIs in women, being superior to the oral taking of isolated PAC.

OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de la profilaxis de las infecciones del tracto urinario (ITUs) con un complemento alimenticio que contiene D-manosa como principio activo principal (Manosar®), en comparación con otro preparado cuyo principio activo único son las proantocianidinas (PAC), ambos de liberación continuada, tras su administración durante24 semanas.MÉTODOS: Estudio experimental multicéntrico, aleatorizado y doble ciego. Se incluyeron 283 mujeres con historia de ITUs recurrentes sin evidencias de complicación. Se randomizaron 1:1 en dos grupos. En un grupo se administró 1 sobre diario oral de Manosar®, y en el otro 1 sobre diario oral de un compuesto de 240 mg de PAC de liberación continuada. Previo a la inclusión en el estudio se confirmó el episodio de ITU al menos por la sintomatología clínica y positividad del test de Combur. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron datos válidos de 184 pacientes con edad media de 49,5 años: 90 recibieron Manosar® y 94 PAC aislado. Un total de 72 pacientes padecieron una ITU por E.coli: 25 pacientes en el brazo con Manosar® frente a 47 pacientes en el grupo de PAC aislado, siendo esta diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0,002). El tiempo libre de nuevas recurrencias de ITU fue de 98,6 días en el grupo tratado con Manosar® y de 84,6 días en el grupo con PAC aislado.CONCLUSIÓN: La toma oral de un sobre al día de Manosar® es eficaz y segura en la prevención de las ITUs recurrentes en la mujer, siendo superior a la toma oral de PAC aislado.

[Clinical and urodynamic risk factors of recurrent urinary tract infections in patients with multiple sclerosis.] / Factores de riesgo clínicos y urodinámicos de infecciones urinarias recurrentes en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk factors of recurrent urinary infections (rUTIs) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 114 patients with MS, 84 women (74%) and 30 men (26%), with a mean age of 49. They underwent videourodynamic study and selective sphincter electromyography due to urinary symptoms (LUTS). Clinical data (both neurological and urological) and videourodynamic data (including free flowmetry, cystomanometry and pressure flow study) were collected. In 37 patients (32%), the presence of rTUIs was demonstrated. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were demonstrated between the patients with and without rUTIs with respect to the following clinical variables: the time of evolution of the symptoms (greater in the case of rUTIs), time from the diagnosis of MS (higher in the case of rUTIs), EDSS score (Expanded Disability Staus Scale) (higher in the case of rUTIs) and the EM type [higher frequency of rUTIs in the progressive types (primary and secondary)]. Urodynamic variables with significant differences were: maximum flow in free flowmetry (lower in patients with rUTIs), voiding volume in free flowmetry (lower in patients with rUTIs), micturition efficiency (higher percentage of residual urine in patients with rUTIs), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (higher frequency of rUTIs in patients with SUI), detrusor pressure at maximum flow (lower in patients with rUTIs) and bladder contractility index (lower in patients with rUTI). No significant difference was demonstrated in relation to the presence and type of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). CONCLUSIONS: The severity and duration of MS is a risk factor for rUTIs. Urodynamic risk factors are compatible with a lower contractile capacity in patients with rUTIs, while the existence of NLUTD would not imply any specific risk factor.

OBJETIVO: Determinar los factores de riesgo de infecciones urinarias recurrentes (rUTIs) en pacientes con Esclerosis Múltiple (EM).MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo en 114 pacientes, 84 mujeres (74%) y 30 varones (26%), de edad media 49 años con EM sometidos a estudio videourodinámico y electromiografía selectiva esfinteriana por presentar síntomas urinarios (LUTS). Se recogieron los datos clínicos (tanto neurológicos como urológicos) y videourodinámicos (incluyendo flujometría libre, cistomanometría y estudio presión flujo). En 37 pacientes (32%) se demostró la presencia de rTUIs. RESULTADOS: Se demostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los pacientes con y sin rUTIs respecto de las siguientes variables clínicas: el tiempo de evolución de los síntomas (mayor en el caso de rUTIs), antigüedad de la EM (mayor en el caso de rUTIs), la puntuación EDSS (Expanded Disability Staus Scale) (mayor en el caso de rUTIs) y el tipo EM [mayor frecuencia de rUTIs en los tipos progresivos (primario y secundario)]. Las variables urodinámicas con diferencias significativas fueron: el flujo máximo en la flujometría libre (menor en pacientes con rUTIs), el volumen miccional en la flujometría libre (menor en pacientes con rUTIs), la eficiencia miccional (mayor porcentaje de residuo en pacientes con rUTIs), la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo (SUI) (mayor frecuencia de rUTIs en pacientes con SUI), la presión del detrusor a flujo máximo (menor en pacientes con rUTIs) y el índice de contractilidad vesical (menor en pacientes con rUTI). No se demostró ninguna diferencia significativa en relación con la presencia y tipo de disfunción neurógena del tracto urinario inferior (NLUTD). CONCLUSIONES: La gravedad y duración de la EM constituye un factor de riesgo para las rUTIs. Los factores de riesgo urodinámicos son compatibles con una menor capacidad contráctil en los pacientes con rUTIs, mientras que la existencia NLUTD no supondría ningún factor de riesgo específico.

Cambios funcionales en la fase miccional de varones diagnosticados de detrusor hipoactivo no neurogénico sometidos a cateterización vesical / Functional changes during the voiding phase in males with non-neurogenic detrusor underactivity undergoing bladder catheterization

Objetivos: Determinar los cambios urodinámicos de la fase miccional en varones con hipocontractilidad del detrusor (DU) sometidos a cateterismo vesical por retención urinaria. Métodos: De un total de 64 pacientes con retención urinaria, se realizó un estudio de seguimiento en 17 varones de edad media 77 años, diagnosticados urodinámicamente de DU por presentar un Índice de Contractilidad Vesical (BCI) menor de 100, sometidos a sonda vesical a permanencia (16 casos) o cateterismo vesical limpio intermitente (1 caso) por retención aguda de orina (14 casos), o residuo postmiccional patológico (3 casos). Los pacientes fueron sometidos a un segundo estudio urodinámico a los 13 meses de seguimiento de media. Las pruebas estadísticas utilizadas fueron el test exacto de Fisher para variables cualitativas y el test de comparación de media de la t de Student para variables paramétricas. El nivel de significación se fijó en p < 0,05 bilateral. Resultados: En el segundo estudio urodinámico, se observó un aumento significativo de la presión máxima del detrusor, la presión a flujo máximo, el BCI y el Índice de Obstrucción de Salida Vesical (BOOI) y del número de pacientes que orinaron durante el estudio presión/ flujo. Conclusiones: El cateterismo vesical en varones con DU mejora significativamente la contractilidad vesical y permiten desenmascarar obstrucciones del tracto urinario inferior que estaban ocultas por una insuficiente presión del detrusor en relación a la DU de estos pacientes. Esto podría tener no sólo aplicaciones diagnósticas, sino pronósticas y terapéuticas

Objectives: To investigate urodynamic changes during the voiding phase in males with detrusor underactivity (DU) undergoing bladder catheterization for urinary retention. Methods: From a total of 64 patients with urinary retention, a follow-up study was performed in 17 males with a mean age of 77 years. Patients received a urody namic diagnosis of DU based on a Bladder Contractility Index (BCI) score of <100 and underwent permanent bladder catheterization (16 cases) or clean intermittent catheterization (1 case) for acute urinary retention (14 cases), or post void residual urine (3 cases). Patients underwent a second urodynamic study after a mean 13 months of follow-up. Fisher’s exact test was used with categorical variables and Student’s t test with parametric variables. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for a two-sided test. Results: The second urodynamic study showed a significant increase in maximal detrusor pressure, pressure at maximum flow rate, BCI score, Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI) score, and number of patients who urinated during the pressure-flow study. Conclusions: Bladder catheterization in men with DU significantly improves bladder contractility and revealed obstructions of the lower urinary tract that were masked by insufficient detrusor pressure in relation to the DU of these patients. These findings could have diagnostic as well as prognostic and therapeutic applications

[Functional changes during the voiding phase in males with non-neurogenic detrusor underactivity undergoing bladder catheterization.] / Cambios funcionales en la fase miccional de varones diagnosticados de detrusor hipoactivo no neurogénico sometidos a cateterización vesical.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate urodynamic changes during the voiding phase in males with detrusor underactivity (DU) undergoing bladder catheterization for urinary retention. METHODS: From a total of 64 patients with urinary retention, a follow-up study was performed in 17 males with a mean age of 77 years. Patients received a urodynamic diagnosis of DU based on a Bladder Contractility Index (BCI) score of < 100 and underwent permanent bladder catheterization (16 cases) or clean intermittent catheterization (1 case) for acute urinary retention (14 cases), or post void residual urine (3 cases). Patients underwent a second urodynamic study after a mean 13 months of follow-up. Fisher's exact test was used with categorical variables and Student's t test with parametric variables. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for a two-sided test. RESULTS: The second urodynamic study showed a significant increase in maximal detrusor pressure, pressure at maximum flow rate, BCI score, Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI) score, and number of patients who urinated during the pressure-flow study. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder catheterization in men with DU significantly improves bladder contractility and revealed obstructions of the lower urinary tract that were masked by insufficient detrusor pressure in relation to the DU of these patients. These findings could have diagnostic as well as prognostic and therapeutic applications.

OBJETIVOS: Determinar los cambios urodinámicos de la fase miccional en varones con hipocontractilidad del detrusor (DU) sometidos a cateterismo vesical por retención urinaria. MÉTODOS: De un total de 64 pacientes con retención urinaria, se realizó un estudio de seguimiento en 17 varones de edad media 77 años, diagnosticados urodinámicamente de DU por presentar un Índice de Contractilidad Vesical (BCI) menor de 100, sometidos a sonda vesical a permanencia (16 casos) o cateterismo vesical limpio intermitente (1 caso) por retención aguda de orina (14 casos), o residuo postmiccional patológico (3 casos). Los pacientes fueron sometidos a un segundo estudio urodinámico a los 13 meses de seguimiento de media. Las pruebas estadísticas utilizadas fueron el test exacto de Fisher para variables cualitativas y el test de comparación de media de la t de Student para variables paramétricas. El nivel de significación se fijó en p < 0,05 bilateral. RESULTADOS: En el segundo estudio urodinámico, se observó un aumento significativo de la presión máxima del detrusor, la presión a flujo máximo, el BCI y el Índice de Obstrucción de Salida Vesical (BOOI) y del número de pacientes que orinaron durante el estudio presión/ flujo. CONCLUSIONES: El cateterismo vesical en varones con DU mejora significativamente la contractilidad vesical y permiten desenmascarar obstrucciones del tracto urinario inferior que estaban ocultas por una insuficiente presión del detrusor en relación a la DU de estos pacientes. Esto podría tener no sólo aplicaciones diagnósticas, sino pronósticas y terapéuticas.

[Spanish consensus document for the diagnosis, treatment and management of neurogenic bladder.] / Documento de consenso español para el diagnóstico, el tratamiento y el manejo de la vejiga neurógena.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this document is to establish practical recommendations on neurogenic bladder (NB) management based on scientific evidence and medical and nursing perspective in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Units as a first multidisciplinary consensual approach in Spain. METHODS: This paper reports results from the first modified Delphi consensus building exercise on this procedure. A committee of recognised opinion-leaders in rehabilitation and urology with special interest in NB was constituted. A working group formed by rehabilitation doctors, urologists and nursing staff of SCI and Neurorehabilitation Units of a number of Spanish hospitals and specialised centres associated with the panel of NB experts have prepared this document. RESULTS: This review provided an overview of the main aspects described by the different clinical guidelines already available and highlighted the need to focus on recommendations in special priority situations in which there was no consensus. In view of the considerable impact this condition has on quality of life, patients should be offered help to better understand the disorder and they should be taught how to use the treatment techniques to obtain satisfactory results and promote their autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: This article presents a version of guidelines for patients with NB. The guidelines define the clinical profile of patients to provide the best evidence- based care and also an overview of the current drug and surgical treatments of NB.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este documento es establecer recomendaciones prácticas sobre el manejo de la vejiga neurógena (VN) en función de la evidencia científica y las perspectivas médicas y de enfermería en Unidades de Lesionados Medulares (ULM) como un primer enfoque de consenso multidisciplinar en España.MÉTODOS: En este artículo se presentan los resultados del primer ejercicio de consenso basado en metodología Delphi modificada sobre este procedimiento. Se constituyó un comité del que formaron parte reconocidos expertos en rehabilitación y urología, especializados en el manejo de VN. Este documento ha sido elaborado por un grupo de trabajo formado por médicos especialistas en rehabilitación, urólogos y personal de enfermería de ULM y unidades de Neurorrehabilitación de varios hospitales y centros especializados españoles asociados con el panel de expertos sobre VN. RESULTADOS: Esta revisión ofrece un resumen de los principales aspectos descritos en diversas guías clínicas ya disponibles y destaca la necesidad de centrarse en recomendaciones sobre situaciones especialmente prioritarias sobre las que actualmente no existe consenso. En vista del considerable impacto de esta enfermedad sobre la calidad de vida, los pacientes deben recibir ayuda para que comprendan mejor su enfermedad y también deben recibir formación sobre el uso de técnicas de tratamiento para conseguir resultados satisfactorios y fomentar su autonomía. CONCLUSIONES: En este artículo se presenta una versión de la guía para el manejo de pacientes con VN. Las guías definen el perfil clínico de los pacientes para ofrecer la mejor asistencia basada en la evidencia y también un resumen de los tratamientos farmacológicos y quirúrgicos actuales para la VN.

Documento de consenso español para el diagnóstico, el tratamiento y el manejo de la vejiga neurógena / Spanish consensus document for the diagnosis, treatment and management of neurogenic bladder

Objetivo: El objetivo de este documento es establecer recomendaciones prácticas sobre el manejo de la vejiga neurógena (VN) en función de la evidencia científica y las perspectivas médicas y de enfermería en Unidades de Lesionados Medulares (ULM) como un primer enfoque de consenso multidisciplinar en España. Métodos: En este artículo se presentan los resultados del primer ejercicio de consenso basado en metodología Delphi modificada sobre este procedimiento. Se constituyó un comité del que formaron parte reconocidos expertos en rehabilitación y urología, especializados en el manejo de VN. Este documento ha sido elaborado por un grupo de trabajo formado por médicos especialistas en rehabilitación, urólogos y personal de enfermería de ULM y unidades de Neurorrehabilitación de varios hospitales y centros especializados españoles asociados con el panel de expertos sobre VN Resultados: Esta revisión ofrece un resumen de los principales aspectos descritos en diversas guías clínicas ya disponibles y destaca la necesidad de centrarse en recomendaciones sobre situaciones especialmente prioritarias sobre las que actualmente no existe consenso. En vista del considerable impacto de esta enfermedad sobre la calidad de vida, los pacientes deben recibir ayuda para que comprendan mejor su enfermedad y también deben recibir formación sobre el uso de técnicas de tratamiento para conseguir resultados satisfactorios y fomentar su autonomía. Conclusiones: En este artículo se presenta una versión de la guía para el manejo de pacientes con VN. Las guías definen el perfil clínico de los pacientes para ofrecer la mejor asistencia basada en la evidencia y también un resumen de los tratamientos farmacológicos y quirúrgicos actuales para la VN

Objectives: The purpose of this document is to establish practical recommendations on neurogenic bladder (NB) management based on scientific evidence and medical and nursing perspective in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Units as a first multidisciplinary consensual approach in Spain. METHODS: This paper reports results from the first modified Delphi consensus building exercise on this procedure. A committee of recognised opinion-leaders in rehabilitation and urology with special interest in NB was constituted. A working group formed by rehabilitation doctors, urologists and nursing staff of SCI and Neurorehabilitation Units of a number of Spanish hospitals and specialised centres associated with the panel of NB experts have prepared this document. Results: This review provided an overview of the main aspects described by the different clinical guidelines already available and highlighted the need to focus on recommendations in special priority situations in which there was no consensus. In view of the considerable impact this condition has on quality of life, patients should be offered help to better understand the disorder and they should be taught how to use the treatment techniques to obtain satisfactory results and promote their autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: This article presents a version of guidelines for patients with NB. The guidelines define the clinical profile of patients to provide the best evidence based care and also an overview of the current drug and surgical treatments of NB

[Efficacy and safety of D-mannose (2 g), 24h prolonged release, associated with Proanthocyanidin (PAC), versus isolate PAC, in the management of a series of women with recurrent urinary infections.] / Eficacia y tolerancia terapéutica de la D­manosa (2 g) de liberación prolongada 24 horas (asociada a proantocianidinas), frente a proantocianidinas aisladas en el manejo de una serie de mujeres con infecciones urinarias recurrentes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of dietary supplement "Manosar®" composed of D-mannose (2 g), 24 h prolonged release, associated with Proanthocyanidin (PAC) (140 mg), ursolic acid (7.98 mg), A, C, and D vitamins and the oligoelement zinc, versus 240 mg of PAC in recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), for a designed follow-up of 24 weeks, in women. METHODS: A multicenter randomized experimental double-blind study was carried out. The study was approved by review board of "Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo" (Spain), and all patients gave informed consent. A total of 150 women with non complicated UTI were screened for participation. Valid data was obtained from 93, with mean age of 48 years. Fortyfour patients were assigned to the Manosar® group and 51 patients to the PAC group. Patients were followed during six months. A previous UTI was defined based on a combination of symptoms and a positive reactive urine trip. Confirmation of a new UTI was based on symptoms, reactive urine strip and urine culture. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (35%) had an UTI during the six months follow-up. The percentage of UTI of the Manosar® group during this period was 24%, while the percentage of the PAC group was 45% (p〈0.05). The disease-free time for the Manosar® group was 95 days, while this time was 79 days for the PAC group. The incidence of side effects was low. Diarrhea was the most frequent side-effect in both groups. CONCLUSION: Manosar® (oral once a day) is more effective than single dose PAC (240 mg daily orally) to prevent recurrent UTI in women.

Eficacia y tolerancia terapéutica de la D-manosa (2 g) de liberación prolongada 24 horas (asociada a proantocianidinas), frente a proantocianidinas aisladas en el manejo de una serie de mujeres con infecciones urinarias recurrentes / Efficacy and safety of D-mannose (2 g), 24h prolonged release, associated with Proanthocyanidin (PAC), versus isolate PAC, in the management of a series of women with recurrent urinary infections

Objetivo: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de un complemento alimenticio (Manosar®) (2 gramos de D-manosa, 140 mg de PAC y 7,98 mg de ácido ursólico junto con las vitaminas A, C y E, y el oligoelemento Zinc) en la recurrencia de la ITU y su comparación con un compuesto basado con 240 mg proantocianidinas (PAC aislado), con una duración de administración esperada de 24 semanas. Métodos: Estudio experimental multicéntrico, aleatorizado y doble ciego. Aprobado por el Comité Ético de Investigación clínica del "Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo". Todos los pacientes firmaron el consentimiento. Se incluyeron 150 mujeres con historia de ITU recurrentes sin evidencias de complicación. Se obtuvieron datos válidos de 93 pacientes con edad media de 47,62 años. 42 recibieron Manosar y 51 PAC aislado. Controles cada 30 días durante 6 meses. La confirmación del episodio clínico previo de ITU fue definido al menos por la sintomatología clínica y tira de orina Combur (positiva a leucocito-esterasa y/o nitritos). La confirmación del nuevo episodio incidente durante el estudio fue confirmado por la sintomatología clínica, tira de orina y urinocultivo. Resultados: 33 pacientes (35,48%) padecieron una ITU durante el periodo de 6 meses de seguimiento. En el grupo tratado con Manosar® se observó ITU a los seis meses en un 23,8%, mientras que en el grupo control (PAC aislado) fue de 45,1% (p<0,05). El tiempo libre de enfermedad fue de 78,81 días en el grupo control (PAC aislado) y de 94,7 días en el grupo tratado con Manosar®. Se observó una baja incidencia de acontecimientos adversos, siendo la diarrea el más frecuente en ambos grupos. Conclusión: La toma oral de Manosar®, un sobre al día, es más eficaz que la toma oral de 240 mg de PAC aislado, un sobre al día, en la prevención de las infecciones urinarias de repetición en la mujer (AU)

Objetive: To compare the efficacy and safety of dietary supplement "Manosar®" composed of D-mannose (2 g), 24 h prolonged release, associated with Proanthocyanidin (PAC) (140 mg), ursolic acid (7.98 mg), A, C, and D vitamins and the oligoelement zinc, versus 240 mg of PAC in recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), for a designed follow-up of 24 weeks, in women. Methods: A multicenter randomized experimental double-blind study was carried out. The study was approved by review board of "Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo" (Spain), and all patients gave informed consent. A total of 150 women with non complicated UTI were screened for participation. Valid data was obtained from 93, with mean age of 48 years. Fortyfour patients were assigned to the Manosar® group and 51 patients to the PAC group. Patients were followed during six months. A previous UTI was defined based on a combination of symptoms and a positive reactive urine trip. Confirmation of a new UTI was based on symptoms, reactive urine strip and urine culture. Results: Thirty-three patients (35%) had an UTI during the six months follow-up. The percentage of UTI of the Manosar® group during this period was 24%, while the percentage of the PAC group was 45% (p<0.05). The disease-free time for the Manosar® group was 95 days, while this time was 79 days for the PAC group. The incidence of side effects was low. Diarrhea was the most frequent side-effect in both groups. Conclusion: Manosar® (oral once a day) is more effective than single dose PAC (240 mg daily orally) to prevent recurrent UTI in women (AU)

Estado actual de la formación urológica en España / Current status of Urological Education in Spain

Introducción: La urología es la especialidad médico-quirúrgica que se ocupa del estudio, diagnóstico y tratamiento de las afecciones del aparato urinario y retroperitoneo en ambos sexos y del aparato genital masculino sin límite de edad. El sistema clásico de formación se basa en la imitación de las habilidades y conductas de los tutores, origina variabilidad en la formación entre los diferentes centros y otorga un rol pasivo a los médicos internos residentes (MIR). Marco Legislativo el BOE: El BOE de 2006 establece los contenidos formativos específicos en sus facetas teórica, práctica y científica. Al iniciar el período formativo MIR, el primer año se centra en la formación quirúrgica general y los cuatro restantes de formación específicamente urológica. Este marco legislativo que regula nuestra especialidad es antiguo, sin previsión de renovación, ya que esta se iba a llevar a cabo con el desarrollo del proyecto de troncalidad, actualmente paralizado tras la sentencia del tribunal supremo. Por lo tanto, nos encontramos en una situación de cierta incertidumbre con un marco legal en planes de renovación. Estado actual de la formación: Una encuesta a nivel nacional pone de manifiesto que el grado de participación quirúrgica de los MIR es bajo, así como el entrenamiento en modelos y asistencia a cursos. Además, la autoconfianza que sienten para realizar intervenciones que podrían considerarse de baja complejidad es alta, para actividades como la consulta es moderada y para intervenciones de moderada-alta complejidad es baja. Conclusión: El programa actual de formación es mejorable y susceptible de actualización. Nuevos estudios y esfuerzos deberían orientarse a estandarizar la adquisición de habilidades quirúrgicas y no quirúrgicas, garantizar y facilitar el acceso a cursos de formación quirúrgica, establecer un mínimo de intervenciones requeridas por año y al final de la residencia, fomentar la formación académica, la participación en investigación de los residentes y lograr una evaluación objetiva de la especialidad (AU)

Introduction: Urology is a medical-surgical specialty that deals with the study, diagnosis and treatment of medical and surgical conditions of the urinary tract and retroperitoneum in both sexes and of the male genital tract without age limit. The traditional method of training is based on the imitation of the skills and behaviors of the tutors, creating variability in the training between different centers and giving a passive role to resident internal physicians (MIR). Legislative framework: The 2006 BOE establishes the specific formative content in its theoretical, practical and scientific facets. At the beginning of the MIR training period, the first year focuses on general surgical training and the remaining four on specific urological training. The current legislative framework that regulates our specialty is one of the oldest, with no prospect of renewal, since this would be carried out with the development of the trunk project, currently paralyzed after the judgment of the Supreme Court. Therefore, we are in a situation of uncertainty with a legal framework in renewal plans. Current state of training: a National survey shows the degree of surgical participation of the MIR is low, as well as training on models and course attendance. In addition, the self-confidence they feel for interventions that could be considered of low complexity is high, for activities such as consultation is moderate and for interventions of moderate-high complexity is low. Conclusion: The current training program is upgradeable. New studies and efforts should aim to standardize the acquisition of surgical and non-surgical skills, guarantee access to surgical training courses, establish a minimum of required interventions per year and at the end of residency, foster academic training, participation in research of residents and achieve an objective assessment of the specialty (AU)

Programa formativo en urología oncológica. Perspectivas de futuro / Training program in oncologic urology. Future prospectives

La urología es una especialidad médico-quirúrgica que se ocupa del estudio, diagnóstico y tratamiento de las afecciones médicas y quirúrgicas del aparato urinario y retroperitoneo en ambos sexos y del aparato genital masculino sin límite de edad, motivadas por padecimientos congénitos, traumáticos, sépticos, metabólicos, obstructivos y oncológicos. La oncologia- urológica es la parte de la Urología más amplia y donde la investigación y los nuevos avances hacen que sea imprescindible un aprendizaje continuo. En este capítulo abordamos todos los aspectos académicos relacionados con la formación en el campo de la uro-oncología (AU)

Urology is a medical-surgical specialty that deals with the study, diagnosis and treatment of the medical and surgical diseases of the urinary apparatus and retroperitoneum in both sexes and the male genital apparatus without age limit, due to congenital, traumatic, septic, metabolic, obstructive and oncological conditions. Urologic oncology is the broadest urological part, where research and new advances make continuous learning essential. In this chapter we treat all academic features related with training in the field of Urooncology (AU)

[Current status of Urological Education in Spain.] / Estado actual de la formación urológica en España.

INTRODUCTION: Urology is a medicalsurgical specialty that deals with the study, diagnosis and treatment of medical and surgical conditions of the urinary tract and retroperitoneum in both sexes and of the male genital tract without age limit. The traditional method of training is based on the imitation of the skills and behaviors of the tutors, creating variability in the training between different centers and giving a passive role to resident internal physicians (MIR). LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK: The 2006 BOE establishes the specific formative content in its theoretical, practical and scientific facets. At the beginning of the MIR training period, the first year focuses on general surgical training and the remaining four on specific urological training. The current legislative framework that regulates our specialty is one of the oldest, with no prospect of renewal, since this would be carried out with the development of the trunk project, currently paralyzed after the judgment of the Supreme Court. Therefore, we are in a situation of uncertainty with a legal framework in renewal plans. CURRENT STATE OF TRAINING: a National survey shows the degree of surgical participation of the MIR is low, as well as training on models and course attendance. In addition, the self-confidence they feel for interventions that could be considered of low complexity is high, for activities such as consultation is moderate and for interventions of moderate-high complexity is low. CONCLUSION: The current training program is upgradeable. New studies and efforts should aim to standardize the acquisition of surgical and non-surgical skills, guarantee access to surgical training courses, establish a minimum of required interventions per year and at the end of residency, foster academic training, participation in research of residents and achieve an objective assessment of the specialty.

[Training program in oncologic urology. Future prospectives.] / Programa formativo en urología oncológica. Perspectivas de futuro.

Urology is a medical-surgical specialty that deals with the study, diagnosis and treatment of the medical and surgical diseases of the urinary apparatus and retroperitoneum in both sexes and the male genital apparatus without age limit, due to congenital, traumatic, septic, metabolic, obstructive and oncological conditions. Urologic oncology is the broadest urological part, where research and new advances make continuous learning essential. In this chapter we treat all academic features related with training in the field of Urooncology.

Efficacy and safety of urinary catheters with silver alloy coating in patients with spinal cord injury: a multicentric pragmatic randomized controlled trial. The ESCALE trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) who carry indwelling urinary catheters have an increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI). Antiseptic silver alloy-coated (SAC) silicone urinary catheters prove to be a promising intervention to reduce UTIs; however, current evidence cannot be extrapolated to patients with SCI. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of SAC urinary catheters for preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections. DESIGN/SETTING: This is an open-label, multicenter (developed in Spain, Portugal, Chile, Turkey, and Italy), randomized clinical trial conducted in 14 hospitals from November 2012 to December 2015. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eligible patients were men or women with traumatic or medical SCI, aged ≥18 years, requiring an indwelling urinary catheter for at least 7 days. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic UTIs. The secondary outcome included bacteremia in the urinary tract and adverse events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive a SAC urinary catheter (experimental group) or a standard catheter (control group) for at least 7 days. Data were compared using chi-squared test and also calculating the absolute risk difference with a 95% confidence interval. An adjusted analysis including different risk factors of UTI was performed. This study was mainly funded by La Marató de TV3 Foundation (grant number # 112210) and the European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network organization. The funders had no role in the interpretation or reporting of results. RESULTS: A total of 489 patients were included in the study, aged 55 years in the experimental group and aged 57 in the control group (p=.870); 72% were men; 43% were hospitalized patients, and 57% were outpatients (p=1.0). The most frequent cause of SCI was traumatic (73.75%), and the localization was mainly the cervical spine (42.74%). Most of the patients had an A score (complete spinal injury and no motor and sensory is preserved) on the ASIA scale (62.37%). The median time of urethral catheterization was 27 days in the experimental group and 28 days in the control group (p=.202). Eighteen patients (7.41%) in the experimental group and 19 in the control (7.72%) group had a symptomatic UTI (odds ratio [OR] 0.96 [0.49-1.87]). The adjusted analysis revealed no change in the results. Only three patients in the experimental group had bacteremia within the urinary tract. The experimental group presented more adverse events related to the use of a catheter than the control group (OR 0.03 [0.00-0.06]). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support the routine use of indwelling antiseptic SAC silicone urinary catheters in patients with SCI. However, UTIs associated to long-term urinary catheter use remain a challenge and further investigations are still needed.

Effect of pelvic organ prolapse repair on detrusor overactivity in women following incontinence surgery: A multivariate analysis.

AIMS: To determine the effect of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair on post-operative detrusor overactivity (DO) in women who have underwent incontinence surgery, using multivariate analysis. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out on a cohort of 105 women who underwent incontinence surgery. In 39 of the patients this surgery was associated with pelvic organ prolapse repair. Clinical and urodynamic data were collected pre- and 3 months post-operatively. A multivariate statistical analysis was performed to detect confounding factors which could influence on the risk factors associated with post-operative detrusor overactivity. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, the following pre-operative factors were associated with post-operative detrusor overactivity: symptomatic mixed urinary incontinence, rectocele, detrusor overactivity, voided volume on free uroflowmetry, maximum cystomanometric capacity, and performing concomitant pelvic organ prolapse repair. Multivariate analysis, by means of confounding factors elimination, revealed that only pre-operative rectocele and detrusor overactivity were independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The pelvic organ prolapse repair acts as a confounding factor. Women with a pre-operative rectocele and detrusor overactivity are on a greater risk to develop post-operative detrusor overactivity and, therefore, they should be informed.